maw_tweets Profile Banner
Michele Avissar-Whiting 🎗️ Profile
Michele Avissar-Whiting 🎗️

@maw_tweets

Followers
889
Following
8K
Media
299
Statuses
4K

Director, Open Science Strategy at HHMI | talk to me about preprints | tweets are mine 🥑🎼🧬🤓🎤

Raleigh, NC
Joined December 2012
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@PardisSabeti
Pardis Sabeti
6 months
Author selfie — but this one feels different. Our newest @sabeti_lab paper came out in Science just as conflict escalated between Israel and Iran, Shira’s and my birth countries. A painful reminder of how fragile the world can be. But also a reminder of what’s possible: that
20
28
225
@conor64
Conor Friedersdorf
9 months
A lot of people know deep down that the Trump Admin is behaving shamefully with regard to Ukraine, but don't want to admit, even to themselves, that America is being dishonorable, so they fixate on matters of no consequence, like Zelensky's manners, to distract their consciences
578
1K
7K
@jessesingal
Jesse Singal
9 months
If Trump would grant Volodymyr Zelensky (head of a country invaded by Russia, w/countless dead soldiers and civilians) a fraction of the grace and open-mindedness he has granted Andrew Tate (accused rapist/sex trafficker), that would be good
132
565
5K
@HenMazzig
Hen Mazzig
10 months
Yarden Bibas burying his wife Shiri and his babies Kfir and Ariel 💔
74
455
3K
@ProfBootyPhD
Professor Booty PhD
10 months
About to click "submit" on my new grant proposal, "Diverse signaling mechanisms engaged by systemic all-trans retinoic acid." Wish me luck!
45
232
5K
@maw_tweets
Michele Avissar-Whiting 🎗️
11 months
Poetry
@MoragMitchell3
Morag Mitchell
11 months
He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.
0
0
3
@gonenlab
Tamir Gonen
11 months
In 2019-2021 @BrentNannenga and I put together this methods in cryoem book. It was a lot of work. It sells for 120$ and chapter downloads are 35$. The publisher informed us that they had 78,000 downloads so far. Thats several million dollars profit for them... We got nothing 😳
5
7
64
@neubadah
Ubadah Sabbagh
1 year
Since we're talking about funding of absurd research by NIH and other federal agencies, the funded scientists: - watching flies fuck - giving rats massages - spending years digging into why jellyfish glow - tracking penguin poop from space - using horseshoe crab blood
32
369
2K
@maw_tweets
Michele Avissar-Whiting 🎗️
1 year
It’s becoming painfully clear that people are incapable or unwilling to understand nuance, unable or unwilling to hold multiple ideas in their heads at once when those ideas create the slightest cognitive dissonance. It’s a maturity issue, and it’s poisoning our discourse.
1
0
6
@rafeequemavoor
Rafeeque Mavoor
1 year
Free scientific illustrations for biologists! 😍 @NIH has released a library of 500+ free scientific illustrations to create figures, presentations, and illustrations! all freely available in the public domain. Retweet and spread the message! https://t.co/p1bD1kxO7H
46
2K
6K
@deevybee
Dorothy Bishop
1 year
A quick response to the story that @eLife won't be listed in Web of Science any more. My experiences with Wellcome Open Research https://t.co/dGxWG2KtHq @WellcomeOpenRes @Clarivate #peerreview
7
23
46
@maw_tweets
Michele Avissar-Whiting 🎗️
1 year
Web of Science is good with indexing venues that routinely publish inadequate research so long as they don't label them as such.
@NewsfromScience
News from Science
1 year
The Web of Science has suspended the journal eLife from its listings because the novel publishing model adopted last year conflicts with Web of Science’s standards for assuring quality.
0
1
1
@gonenlab
Tamir Gonen
1 year
The 2024 Summit is over and it was quite an event! We are planning to hold this Summit annually going forward, at Lake Arrowhead as a regular venue. If you know someone that should be invited let us know. All attendees speak. Self nominations are welcome!
1
3
34
@maw_tweets
Michele Avissar-Whiting 🎗️
1 year
This is truly awful. God forbid we should be able to see scientists' comments on research and that reviewers should be accountable and credited for their input. We have totally lost the plot.
2
0
6
@cshperspectives
Richard Sever
1 year
And they cost ~1% of journal articles (~0.01% of research). So whatever you think of peer review (we need more vs less vs different vs none), supporting a mechanism that provides rapid and universal free access to knowledge should be a no-brainer
journals.plos.org
Preprint servers are a low-cost mechanism for providing free access to research findings, and can also significantly accelerate research itself by making results available immediately. This Perspec...
@AMartinezArias
Alfonso Martinez Arias
1 year
#Preprints are important and valued in (most) job and fellowship applications. Also, they are the best currency for exchange of information, feedback and proof of what we are doing with funding.
3
17
81
@maw_tweets
Michele Avissar-Whiting 🎗️
1 year
"Discover Concrete and Cement hasn’t published any papers yet; it will need strong foundations to succeed." ICWYDT, @Journalologist
2
0
2
@DrRobDavidson
Dr. Rob Davidson MD, MPH
1 year
As a doctor whose wife experienced 4 miscarriages amongst the 3, now healthy adult children we have raised, I can’t stop thinking about @JDVance’s answers on abortion during the VP debate. Here is the problem with his and Trump’s “leave it to the states” approach. 1/13
453
7K
36K
@maw_tweets
Michele Avissar-Whiting 🎗️
1 year
Appreciating this perfectly framed shot taken by @RouhiRoo …woman of many talents.
2
0
10
@maw_tweets
Michele Avissar-Whiting 🎗️
1 year
Shanah Tovah…for the love of all that is good and holy, please make it a better one.
0
0
2
@maw_tweets
Michele Avissar-Whiting 🎗️
1 year
Sara @RouhiRoo live tweeting my talk today, making me sound much smarter than I actually am. #thankyou
@RouhiRoo
Sara Rouhi on Bsky @RouhiRoo.bsky.social
1 year
#SSPND24 @maw_tweets PRC doesn't throw out #peerreview but frames it in a more realistic light: valuable discourse that's transparent. "What I love most is that it elevates peer review. Demands a different level of accountability. Reviews can be credited" #openscience
2
2
7