@lloydblankfein
Lloyd Blankfein
4 years
Hospitals are not overwhelmed; most of us will be exposed anyway since we can’t sequester until there’s a vax; and we know which groups need protection from worst outcomes. Is the public health benefit from broad lockdowns at this point worth such extreme damage to livelihoods?
2K
1K
6K

Replies

@dmittler123
David
4 years
@lloydblankfein Ask democrats then yes.
0
0
0
@mikelico
Mike Licosati
4 years
@lloydblankfein Of course not. Worst public policy decision ever on a cost/benefit basis.
0
0
0
@mikozlowski
Michael Kozlowski
4 years
@lloydblankfein You haven't been "most of us" in years
0
0
0
@jonmmiles
Jon Miles
4 years
@lloydblankfein "Most of us will be exposed anyway" is not a forgone conclusion and should not be accepted as an inevitability. We did not accept it with HPV, HIV, Ebola, SARS-1 and many others. We should not accept in with SARS-2 Fight. That is the economically prudent thing to do. -
3
7
105
@lloydblankfein #HEPA filtration to reduce the #Covid19 virus concentration people Maybe exposed to in low humidity and public spaces, like hospitals, meat processors, nursing homes, schools, etc?
0
0
0
@Dr_PhillipB
pjb.eth
4 years
@lloydblankfein Speak on it
0
0
0
@CellularMedici2
David Oxley
4 years
@lloydblankfein We know the answer is no by evidence of the depression-like unemployment happening now, which will get worse if common sense reopening of economic activity is impeded by continued public health policy overreach.
0
0
0
@bbharden
Living_Exceptionally
4 years
@lloydblankfein “Livelihoods”??? If it were only livelihoods then we might have a debate. How about disrupting State and local govts, home mortgage industry, home values, commercial real estate, business after business, capitalism itself, and the reserve currency. Wisdom and bravery needed
0
0
0
@jkishore
Joseph Kishore
4 years
@lloydblankfein You have a typo. You meant to write, "Is the public health benefit from broad lockdowns at this point worth such extreme damage to *stock portfolios*?
0
0
7
@lecwah1
Citizen Tom
4 years
@lloydblankfein No, it was done in error from the very beginning.
0
0
0
@llatvala
Lawrence Latvala
4 years
@lloydblankfein The grim reaper forgot to consult the head of MassGeneral — FL & NY have similar populations. FL was excoriated but focused on the very vulnerable while NY focused on the broad public and increased risk for the vulnerable. NY had mass death as a result. FL saved countless lives.
0
0
0
@_JohnWhelan
John W. |🇮🇪🇺🇸🇪🇸🇪🇺|
4 years
@lloydblankfein It is time to go back to work dammit. The whole point of "flattening the curve" was to prevent the hospitals from getting overwhelmed. Well, check that box dammit.
0
0
1
@kligris
Kosta Ligris
4 years
0
0
0
@FoxscFox
Bill Fox
4 years
@lloydblankfein @carlquintanilla Amen, it is very concerning that it’s just the democrats that are still willing to destroy the economy and continue to heavy hand their population.
0
0
0
@pileat_thracia
Pileat Thracicus
4 years
@lloydblankfein Unfortunately economic woes take second place to election strategies...If only Election Day would come sooner.
0
0
0
@ag_trader
AGTrader
4 years
@lloydblankfein you first Lloyd.
0
0
17
@tr1010
TR2020
4 years
@lloydblankfein Forget the lockdowns. Everyone should just wear a quality mask.
0
0
0
@MarketingMonika
Monika Bialokur
4 years
@lloydblankfein Hospitals WERE overwhelmed in NYC BOS & more. Just follow #MedTwitter patients/health workers sick & dying. W/out measures taken, it would be far worse, in the US where sickness often =bankruptcy. Controlling the virus fixes the economy. Fixing economy does not control virus.
0
0
1
@jimstewartson
Jim Stewartson, Counterinsurgent 🇺🇸🇺🇦💙🎈
4 years
@lloydblankfein Fucking monster
0
0
0
@PaulMeloan
Paul Meloan
4 years
@lloydblankfein Today's episode of "Dude With a Lot of Capital at Risk" needs everyone else back in the pool, now. Might mean a little more if he were also advocating higher taxes on the rich who are doing so well right now compared to 40 million people who have lost their jobs.
0
0
0