Nuremberg laws were passed by democratically elected government on 15 Sep 1935.
What happened after that?
Dear Ms. Roopa IPS
You protect lives for a living.
My name is Dr. Jonathan
I save lives for a living.
Lets meet halfway & agree that this law is legally right morally wrong🙏
@AlNamr__
Show some spine and put your name and pic . Act passed by parliament is a law mow. You are a criminal if you don't obey the law. No end to idiocy like yours.
947
144
743
60
689
2K
Replies
So all you muppets who keep castigating us for making references to Hitler for comparison can bugger off now.
Hitler, Mussolini were ‘products of democracy’, says BJP leader Ram Madhav via
@scroll_in
0
5
12
0
1
2
@just1doctorwala
@saliltripathi
There was no independence in 1935. Don't justify your illegal act of violating the Law of the land.
14
0
0
🤦🏽♂️
Please put down your WhatsApp device, pick up a history book and read about what laws and WHICH country I refer to. Don't display your ignorance to the world like this. Humble request 🙏
3
15
72
1
5
42
@just1doctorwala
Bewakooof .. CAA grants the citizenship to the persecuted minorities 4m the three Islamic nations.. It is giving dignity and safety to some unfortunates ..it does not take away anything from anybody.. jokers like r becoming Dr is actually morally wrong .. CAA is a LAW ukhaad le
3
0
1
"persecuted minorities... dignity and safety..."
It is like all these IT cell muppets copy paste the same texts..
But when questioned about minorities who are already Indian citizens and what we go through? *Silence*
1
0
4
1
0
4
@just1doctorwala
@Advaidism
The CAA law is not even 'legally' right. It doesn't confirm to the constitution. If a Parliament by majority passes a law 'all blue eyed babies must be killed' will
@D_Roopa_IPS
obey this law while it is in force?
4
2
25
@lizsesh
@Advaidism
@D_Roopa_IPS
I defer to your expertise but my understanding is until a court (assume SC) overturns this isn't it technically legal since it was passed by parliament?
2
0
6
@just1doctorwala
All your points are correct...but please let go of this Nazi fixation..it dilutes the argument
1
0
0
@just1doctorwala
Moral compass is simple.
Anything which harms/hampers another human being on the basis of their birth conditions like race, ethnicity, gender, belief etc should be looked down upon.
0
0
5
@just1doctorwala
Its not jst abt CAA alone sir lik most pro-govt voices argue...cleverly she doesnt speak abt dangers of NRC + CAA & wat happend already n Assam...!
0
0
5
@just1doctorwala
@brumbyoz
@D_Roopa_IPS
being a civil servant you can’t be so naive not to see fascist tendencies. It doesn’t behave well for someone, tasked with the responsibility of protecting citizens, to support criminals & goons.
If a society is not just can law & order be maintained? Think about it
1
0
1
@just1doctorwala
@Advaidism
One more difference to point out....some statistic a few years back showed 12 policemen for every 1 VIP in our country....but 1 policeman for 700 citizens. Current numbers may be worse...but you get the idea. Policing protects certain citizens.
0
2
4
@just1doctorwala
@Suresh_Mathew_
So is RTE with the 93rd amendment giving exclusion to minority run schools. Or minority only schemes for scholarship, housing etc. Or the UPA creating a ministry of minority affairs in a "secular" country. All legally right & morally wrong.
1
0
4
@just1doctorwala
@D_Roopa_IPS
Every country has right to protect its borders and people. In the same way every country needs to know who is staying in the country and who belongs here. There has to be a mechanism to identify its citizens and who are not. Immigrants are rightfully allowed anytime.
2
0
0
@just1doctorwala
@D_Roopa_IPS
Can u see in Article 14. 'Religion'... Btw 'sex' is also there, acc to which u got this opportunity to be equal and be in police force. So any law passed by parliament that contradicts n says no women police officer. Then, wud tht law b constitutional or legal?
1
1
1