Out now: the Special Issue on THE FUTURE OF COMPUTATIONAL LAW, a series of position papers by thought leaders in the domain: @sarahlawsky @lyria1 @DMerigoux @sayashk Peter Henderson @random_walker @NatalieByrom @florisbex @FrankPasquale @JcMalgieri 1/.

RT @paulus0: Check the newest issue of @journalcrcl: “The Future of Computational Law” here:. I had the privilege t….

RT @DMerigoux: This special issue of the CRCL journal with 8 position papers is a beacon in the fog of war created by technological FOMO an….

RT @lyria1: Excited that this is out - fresh thinking on computational law from across the disciplinary spectrum. Thanks to @mireillemoret,….

RT @random_walker: Our paper dissecting AI hype in law by @sayashk, @PeterHndrsn and me is now officially published. .

Thanking my co-editor in chief @FrankPasquale for his inspiring collaboration and the vigorous, keen and energetic editors of the journal Katie Atkinson, @lyria1, Gianmarco Gori, Fleur Johns, @MCBRIDEPAULINE, Denis Merigoux and Jat Singh, see

RT @mireillemoret: This book should be read by whoever decide on the deployment of ‘AI’. We can speak of the ethics of AI, often assuming t….

RT @mireillemoret: @sayashk The book will be a rare treat in the midst of all the hype and doom. It should start a genuine conversation bas….

RT @lyria1: Great piece by @DMerigoux and colleagues. Read if interested in HOW law is automated and consequent issues on the kinds of choi….

RT @BhumikaBilla: My paper introducing the Information Theory of Law is finally out! Super grateful to Simon Deakin for supervising, @lyria….

RT @DMerigoux: How to mitigate from adversarial attacks of machine learning systems, both technically and legally ? In a recently published….

And here comes an important contribution to the vulnerabilities of legal technologies that deploy machine learning, check it out:.

Recent article was published & replied, on the cusp of law and information theory, demonstrating zest in crossing disciplinary boundaries - the question is always how this contributes and what is the added value. Key questions that cannot be raised in mono-disciplinary settings.

RT @lyria1: Honoured to edit "Law as Code: Exploring Information, Communication and Power in Legal Systems" by.@BhumikaBilla., with a thoug….

@CeciliaRikap @demogramas If you are not yet deeply curious about the speculative lens offered by @demogramas and struck by the willingness to engage with a critical thinker across disciplinary boundaries, I wish you luck 12/12, see again

@CeciliaRikap In his response @demogramas finds that “In what follows I will argue that many of her criticisms stem from confusions — probably caused by our differing disciplinary back-grounds, the compressed form of the article and my limited capacity for clarity” 11/.

In her cross-disciplinary reply @CeciliaRikap finds that “This concretization of the idea of platforms’ ruling power certainly advances our understanding of platforms, however reducing rules to norms is problematic, because platforms, more than norming, are formatting agents” 10/.

“I introduce the notion of the transdividual user as the mode of existence taken by human-nonhuman populations as the correlate of data-driven platforms” 9/.

“I distinguish between three types of norms constitutive of nomic platforms: coded, interfacial and environmental (or ground) norms. The first two have been often confused in ‘code as law’ literature, while the third type seems to remain largely unknown to legal theory” 8/.

“Though it is vital to protect the affordances of law-as-we-know-it from rapid deterioration, I argue that it is at least equally important for legal thought to be able to speculate about the potential affordances of computational law” 7/.