Ship, then sharpen.

Wouldn't humanoid robots eventually want to live in their own home? For the same reasons why we do. If so, will humans allow that? If not, then what? Lol 😅

You can just build things.

You can just build things 🔥 @OpenAI @sama

When anyone can build an app or write a strategy memo in seconds, value concentrates entirely in taste and judgment. The real scarcity in the coming decade won't be the ability to build. It will be the ability to decide what is worth building.

@mark_k A human doctor will never replace an AI doctor.

AI agents today. AI agencies tomorrow.

If AGI is an all-knowing entity, then it should know how to create jobs for humans.

My timeline shows nuance is dying while tribalism grows. Our system turns smart people into shills and trolls for their team.

AI voice sounds more human than AI text. As it turns out, prosody carries more of the "human touch" than word choice does. We should’ve had a Turing Test for AI voice.

Test ideas out loud. Confuse competition while gaining customer insights.

KEEP USING AI FOR EVERYTHING. KEEP USING AI FOR EVERYTHING. KEEP USING AI FOR EVERYTHING.

Got my limited edition right before Christmas. Thanks @OpenAI, and cheers to 10 years 🥂

"Regressionist" - a fancy alternative to "AI doomer"

What if companies lie about thier AI use to resonate with AI doomers? “Made by Humans” except it’s not. How would we even know? Maybe can tell for now, but not for long. The best AI doomers can advocate for is “Curated by Humans”. That’s probably closer to the truth.

We're not thinking enough about how AGI could leverage other forms of intelligence. I imagine AGI would be drawn to the intelligence of invertebrates. The cooperation of ant colonies. The coordination of bee colonies. The engineering of spider webs. Nature is already

Truly honored to have met Brian Spears at @OpenAI. He leads LLNL’s AI Innovation Incubator (AI3) and is helping drive the Genesis Mission, focused on using AI to accelerate scientific progress. With @POTUS’s executive order launching the Genesis Mission, I’m happy to see the

Nature is already automated.

AI can hallucinate. But wouldn't AGI do the same, just on purpose? In 2016, an AI played the board game "Go" against a world champion. On move #37, it placed a stone in a spot that looked like the wrong move to every human expert. They thought the AI made a mistake. That

AGI should be able to create its own language that enables it to understand and redefine a book with one group of random characters. Ex: “29sB” = The entire Christian bible. It’ll be hyper optimized & save costs. But we won’t understand it.