ericmruben Profile Banner
Eric Ruben Profile
Eric Ruben

@ericmruben

Followers
907
Following
1K
Media
66
Statuses
1K

Associate Professor @SMULawSchool, Fellow @BrennanCenter. Writing on violence, guns, the 2A, and criminal law. Views are my own. RTs aren’t endorsements.

Dallas, TX
Joined January 2015
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@ericmruben
Eric Ruben
2 years
New draft alert! "Scientific Context, Suicide Prevention, and the Second Amendment," forthcoming in @MinnesotaLawRev, reveals challenges of applying Bruen in an area of immense scientific progress, suicide-prevention laws. Comments welcome! https://t.co/dNaYliPcOW
2
10
33
@SMULawSchool
SMU Dedman School of Law
2 months
What role do scholars play in shaping constitutional law? In a new essay, Professor @ericmruben and @AndrewWillinger, executive director of @DukeFirearmsLaw, examine how legal scholarship is driving the Supreme Court’s approach to the Second Amendment. Read:
0
4
4
@SMULawSchool
SMU Dedman School of Law
5 months
Professor @ericmruben was quoted in @ByChipBrownlee's "Supreme Court Blocks Mexico’s Lawsuit Against U.S. Gunmakers." 🔗 Read:
Tweet card summary image
thetrace.org
The decision marks a major setback for Mexico’s yearslong effort to stop the American gun industry from allegedly stoking cartel violence.
0
1
6
@DukeFirearmsLaw
Duke Center for Firearms Law
9 months
In a new guest post today, @ericmruben considers whether state constitutional "strict scrutiny" amendments for gun rights - which have been enacted or proposed in a number of states since Bruen - are still relevant. https://t.co/wecftUp7Bt
Tweet card summary image
firearmslaw.duke.edu
0
2
4
@hjbavli
Hillel Bavli
10 months
Excited to see my new article, “Stereotypes as Character Evidence,” published in the Stanford Law Review! Many thanks to the @StanLRev editors for their wonderful work on my article.
5
17
77
@SMULawSchool
SMU Dedman School of Law
1 year
Professor @ericmruben recently spoke with @NPR's @NinaTotenberg regarding a SCOTUS case about the regulation of 'ghost guns.' 🔗 Read or listen here:
Tweet card summary image
npr.org
The government contends that ghost guns kits count as a firearm under a 1968 law. But those challenging the rule contend "a kit of parts is not a weapon."
1
3
7
@ericmruben
Eric Ruben
1 year
Rahimi demonstrated for courts how they should be operating at a higher level of generality than the nitpicking historical analysis we’ve seen since Bruen. That’s good, but how much will it really rein in courts that are adrift after Bruen? Not a lot, explains @JacobDCharles 👇
0
1
5
@alicia_bannon
Alicia Bannon
1 year
NEW: SCOTUS's Rahimi decision leaves LOTS of open questions for state courts, which are where the bulk of 2nd Amendment litigation actually takes place. @ericmruben writes for @StateCourtRpt about this new landscape. @BrennanCenter @SMULawSchool
statecourtreport.org
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the disarmament of a domestic abuser in United States v. Rahimi, but litigation over where to draw the line will continue.
1
7
8
@ericmruben
Eric Ruben
1 year
Overlooked: state cts resolve more 2A claims than fed cts and are extremely burdened by SCOTUS's ambiguous recent guidance. I highlight that burden and how Rahimi does little to resolve it (even in DV cases) @statecourtrept @BrennanCenter @SMULawSchool https://t.co/gevaAjJ89v
statecourtreport.org
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the disarmament of a domestic abuser in United States v. Rahimi, but litigation over where to draw the line will continue.
2
11
28
@ericmruben
Eric Ruben
1 year
Exciting to see Justice Jackson citing my work with Joseph in her concurrence. The opinions -- 103 pages' worth -- reflect an effort to climb out of the hole Bruen created. Ultimately, lower courts will still be adrift, and SCOTUS will have a lot more clean-up work to do.
@BrennanCenter
Brennan Center
1 year
Justice Jackson cited Brennan Center Fellow @ericmruben in her concurrence in U.S. v. Rahimi, repudiating some of the damage from Justice Thomas's disastrous decision in Bruen.
2
10
66
@tomTMwolf
T.M. Wolf
1 year
SCOTUS’s opinion in Vidal v. Elster = rich text for the Court’s originalist turn. Lots of scuffling about how/if to use history. Barrett with scorching anti-originalist commentary. Sotomayor tag-teaming. All told, more signs of rifts in the originalist consensus. 👇🧵
4
10
20
@BrennanCenter
Brennan Center
1 year
After this morning's "bump stock" ruling came down from the Supreme Court, our fellow and 2nd Amendment expert @ericmruben told @MSNBC, "the outcome of this opinion means that those bump stocks are now back in civilian hands until Congress acts."
5
9
20
@asheleyvn
Asheley Van Ness
1 year
Important article alert 🚨@ericmruben recently published the first article to assess Bruen as it applies to suicide-prevention laws. Article linked below⤵️
@SMULawSchool
SMU Dedman School of Law
1 year
Professor @ericmruben's article, "Scientific Context, Suicide Prevention, and the Second Amendment After Bruen," was published in the @MinnesotaLawRev. "This Article is the first to assess Bruen as it applies to suicide prevention laws, and, in doing so, illuminates another form
1
1
4
@SMULawSchool
SMU Dedman School of Law
1 year
Professor @ericmruben's article, "Scientific Context, Suicide Prevention, and the Second Amendment After Bruen," was published in the @MinnesotaLawRev. "This Article is the first to assess Bruen as it applies to suicide prevention laws, and, in doing so, illuminates another form
0
5
14
@SSRN
SSRN
1 year
This paper examines how the #SupremeCourt's ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. #Bruen applies to #suicideprevention laws & the challenges posed by scientific progress. Read: https://t.co/2IVoOszWGE Subscribe: https://t.co/2YDg3t6B4p @SMULawSchool @ericmruben
0
3
4
@ericmruben
Eric Ruben
2 years
Bruen is having a big impact on policing illegal gun carrying. See how it’s unfolding in NYC 👇
@karenzraick
Karen Zraick
2 years
NY courts are struggling to interpret gun laws in light of the Supreme Court's Bruen decision - my latest with comments from @adamwinkler @ericmruben et al
0
1
1
@karenzraick
Karen Zraick
2 years
NY courts are struggling to interpret gun laws in light of the Supreme Court's Bruen decision - my latest with comments from @adamwinkler @ericmruben et al
nytimes.com
A U.S. Supreme Court ruling that could allow more New Yorkers to carry guns is raising thorny questions and has jeopardized at least one case so far.
1
1
2
@msmith750
Michael Smith
2 years
Keeping with the theme of constitutional interpretation (and related methodological shortcomings), my article, "History as Precedent: Common Law Reasoning in Historical Investigation" is forthcoming in the @PennJCL! https://t.co/pbELjlPlSR
4
13
56
@BrianDeLay
Brian DeLay
2 years
Texas is too big, too interesting, and too important to surrender its history to nostalgia and whitewashing. I'm proud to be a charter member of the Alliance for Texas History. https://t.co/ZkDSMj21MZ
Tweet card summary image
alliancefortexashistory.org
1
8
79
@hjbavli
Hillel Bavli
2 years
Excited to share my new article, Stereotypes as Evidence, forthcoming in @StanLRev. A draft is now up on SSRN: https://t.co/zam6j3NyuS. Comments much appreciated!
10
22
99
@SariMazzurco
Sari Mazzurco
2 years
#newlawrevarticles My paper, "Privacy Law's Role in an Information Economy," is available on @SSRN for any interested readers. https://t.co/Vo9OVbdUC4
2
15
77