@emilyroseon
Emily O'Neill
12 days
That is the lowest pairing of all from the producers. Pairing a heavy drinker with someone who struggles, what planet are you on where you think that is ok???? Begginning to think the villians completely are the producers ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ #MAFSUK
5
7
303

Replies

@judyju18
Judy
11 days
@emilyroseon Once again the producers & "the most out of touch 3 expert's" have shown they have "NO duty of care for vulnerable contestants", they purposely for clickbaiting viewing purposes matched them with people who would trigger their vulnerabilities & mental health more #MAFSUK #MAFS
0
0
4
@Katifer_5
Kate
11 days
@emilyroseon I genuinely think it would be more interesting if they just paired โ€œnormalโ€ people who want the same thing at this point ๐Ÿ˜‚
0
0
1
@Heinessight
Matthew Heines Producer/Director Author
1 month
What do you do when you're call blasting Bigfoot in eastern Washington, a pool of mysterious blood shows up in your tent and you can't find any answers? You call in Dr. @SimeonHein and his remote viewers. Then, for verification, you call in Intuitive TishPaquette at the
0
9
15
@AshleaLewis
Ashlea Lewis
11 days
@emilyroseon It's seriously irresponsible
0
0
0
@gogsy00
Gogsy66
12 days
@emilyroseon Agree. The producers and the experts are giving second hand embarrassment. Typical lefty television workers with a budget.
1
0
0
@inkandswords
k e l s e y โš”๏ธ
10 days
@emilyroseon Tbf she was very โ€œI want to settle down I want to change thatโ€ I think thereโ€™s an element of people chatting shit and showing their best face to the producers and โ€œexpertsโ€ but then who they really are becomes exposed the second the show starts
0
0
0