Quite obvious that Generative AI has been used, but I would rather question the peer reviewer and the handling editor as well. How did it go unnoticed? #AcademicTwitter
"Ccertainly, here is a possible introduction for you." "... there are concerns that the authors appear to have used Generative AI ..." It appears that the authors used GenAI. Looks fairly obvious to me. Article: https://t.co/GNeyKmEtCb Retraction: https://t.co/kvVzyjKsEU
2
0
2
Replies
@doc_santanu Most underrated steps by authors - proofreading! I have seen many authors think that their job is done after the acceptance of the paper!
1
0
1
@himelmondal Many authors feel that acceptance & publication is the final step. They are least bothered about how good the manuscript sounds when read by other people. This may be one of the reasons of the apparent malaise in proof reading of an accepted manuscript. N.B: not for all authors
1
1
1