charleswangb Profile Banner
Charles Wang Profile
Charles Wang

@charleswangb

Followers
2K
Following
4K
Media
1K
Statuses
12K

Bio/Medicine/Health AI. Transform life and the world. Complexity—Universality—Regenerativity—Transformation—Progress

Silicon Valley, CA
Joined June 2009
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
1 year
Proteins act as active matter, creating intelligibility by coming together and staying together dynamically to cultivate mutual constraints and mutual affordances, giving rise to biological structural functional organizations (SFOs).
26
43
244
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
18 hours
With these distinctions in place, it is silly to claim or even debate “AGI is here” if AGI is meant to capable of navigating full stack dynamics, not just their homomorphic fields.
0
0
1
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
18 hours
I make a clear distinction between emulation and simulation. Mental simulation is integrated full stack Deacon dynamics, not just morphospace, as exemplified by “Hawkins Coffee Cup” or Wozniak's Coffee Test. Emulation is a “philosophical zombie”, mirroring in H space.
2
0
1
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
18 hours
Add c, m, e, or h (computational, machine, emulated, homomorphic) to AI understanding, reasoning, thinking etc. H is most appropriate for GenAI, navigating morphodynamic space. With this core characteristic, no more misattribution of homeodynamics or teleodynamics or combo to AI.
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
5 days
Let me repeat:. LLMs has NO understanding, reasoning, world modeling, agency, sentience, consciousness…as any biological being does in the real world. Yet this does NOT tarnish its immense usefulness—one of most powerful things invented so far: <homomorphy ⇌ context>
Tweet media one
1
0
1
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
3 days
RT @charleswangb: @bengoertzel Cool. Intelligence should be engineered in ways that its primary mode can never be exclusively centralized;….
0
1
0
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
3 days
If you are wondering where these Ts come from, look at this “tiny market”, $125T, and have a sense of why we need that much compute:.
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
1 year
My tweets are not cheap; some are worth 7 trillion dollars each if they are engineered into distributed platforms, marketplaces, and ecosystems to systematically see through illusion and deep into reality, to inexhaustibly cultivate meaning in both life and cosmic connections.
0
0
1
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
3 days
If UTM is a multi century startup, NVDA at $4T is still MVP; . PMF in value creation impacting people’s daily lives will bring it to $20T. In growth and scaling, $100T. In a mature business phase ready for “managerial class”, thrust to $1000T summit . Still, early, very early.
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
2 months
At what point and when this may become salient to mind:. NVDA vs US market cap. NVDA vs world market cap.
1
0
1
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
3 days
Or claiming on one without the other is superficial. An implausibility. As a matter of fact, the very notion of plausibility demonstrates this: <multiple lines of convergence ⇌ multiaptness>. Without convergence it’s conspiracy theory; without multiaptness it’s deepity.
0
0
1
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
3 days
GenAI also exemplifies this in the interplay of <homomorphic field ⇌ contextual field>. Both fields are of the same reality, the human knowledge that are both context-sensitive while being domain general. Having one without the other is useless.
1
0
2
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
3 days
Now repeat on next hundreds of fields at a whole new level—blowing off artificial barriers, seeing a thing as in-itself and beyond-itself. You are in the melody while sensitive to the tiny notes.
1
0
1
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
3 days
Once you get into the depth of dozens of fields, you’ll see they are all coherently connected, flow and bleed into each other. And that knowledge allows you to see deeper into the fields.
1
0
1
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
3 days
There is no such a thing as world class generalist without being ultra specialist.
1
0
5
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
4 days
A second-order benefit of vato is its built-in capability to identify scammers as 'negative vato'—those who neither embody real value nor engage in value creation, and who fail to contribute to the ways and modes of exploring, shaping, and redefining both.
0
0
1
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
4 days
Replace crypto with value tokenization (“vato”) to rebirth the industry—get rid of scammers and reward honest innovation on tokenizing value and its creation as an AI native technology. Vato the future, crypto no more.
2
0
2
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
5 days
RT @charleswangb: Let me repeat:. LLMs has NO understanding, reasoning, world modeling, agency, sentience, consciousness…as any biological….
0
1
0
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
5 days
This mindset is ultra poisonous—spread misattributions and mythologies to fulfill hidden agenda:.
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
1 month
Semantics may fool people but grammars can’t hide—Dario and Anthropic resemble the communist party.
Tweet media one
0
0
0
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
5 days
This understanding is nontrivial and should bear in mind as always. Right expectation entails proper actions. If not, we will be facing dilemmas like this, risking of boxing up or restricting a novel technology that has enormous upside potential:.
@kenneth0stanley
Kenneth Stanley
5 days
I worry that so much discussion of AI risks and alignment overlooks the rather large elephant in the room: creativity and open-endedness. Policy makers and gatekeepers need to understand two competing forces that no one seems to talk about: (1) there is a massive economic.
1
0
0
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
5 days
Let me repeat:. LLMs has NO understanding, reasoning, world modeling, agency, sentience, consciousness…as any biological being does in the real world. Yet this does NOT tarnish its immense usefulness—one of most powerful things invented so far: <homomorphy ⇌ context>
Tweet media one
1
1
1
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
5 days
That’s right, hallucination isn’t all-in-itself a problem when humans take the center role of meaning- and sense-making. It is a BIG problem when LLM is imposed as “ministry of truth”, it is not, it has NO understanding whatsoever than just navigating the homomorphic space.
@martin_casado
martin_casado
5 days
More and more I use language models for reasoning and opinions, not to learn facts. For example I ask about arguments for an against a situation. Or an opinion with long form justification. as a result, I rarely worry about hallucinations anymore.
1
0
0
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
5 days
SPT and four orders.
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
11 days
Tweet media one
0
0
0
@charleswangb
Charles Wang
5 days
With the arrival of homo morphies, the nice thing is that one can put these ideas in a few pages, instantly translate them into computational algorithms. Focus on how reality works, staying on higher order complexity, like a master chef directing morphies to cook dishes for you.
1
0
0