@buschvalentine
Trudy Busch Valentine
2 years
I’m committing to taking no salary as a Senator and working to pass a bipartisan ban on stock trading by any sitting members of Congress. I’ve dedicated my life to serving others. In the Senate, I’ll work for no one but you.
33
48
240

Replies

@blackwidow07
veronica o'brien
2 years
@buschvalentine Good for you @buschvalentine ! You should not be punished for having resources that others may not have. As long as you try to do right then that is all that matters. Stay strong as politics about now is truly a "blood sport".
0
0
2
@Richardson4MO
Erik Richardson
2 years
@buschvalentine What?? No, take the salary you'd be earning and turn around and donate it to help build Dem infrastructure & a candidate pipeline in Missouri—esp. the rural districts! You are missing a golden chance here to show how your win would change our future quickly.
0
0
3
@WillCJohn
Will J.
2 years
@buschvalentine A "no salary" commitment that does nothing for someone who's already wealthy really just reinforces Congress as a rich person's club. The working class can't afford to not earn a salary. A stock trading ban would be great though.
0
0
53
@stefenenick
stephanie b.
2 years
@buschvalentine @daltonwcrawford aka "i have so much money, i don't need your stinkin' salary."
0
0
3
@SomeOfJess
SomeOfJess
2 years
@buschvalentine This is not the flex you think it is. Good on the stock trading ban, though.
0
0
13
@jerry318318
Jerry Willett
2 years
@buschvalentine No salary is just a stupid stunt. Senators should earn a salary and not be required to be independently wealthy.
1
0
9
@Matt_Severn
Matt Severn
2 years
@buschvalentine Easy to say you won’t take a salary if you are wealthy but all it does is make it harder for normal people from normal backgrounds who don’t have piles of family money to work in politics
0
1
4
@Euthyphro__
Langston
2 years
@buschvalentine I want to vote for someone who has a relatable enough background to me, that they need their govt salary.
0
0
3
@HarryTHop
Harry Hop
2 years
@buschvalentine Yes to a stock ban.
0
0
1
@bmdd1079
Brian Dunn
2 years
@buschvalentine How about you pull out of the race and throw your support behind @SpencerToder
0
0
15
@Glenhorton17
Glen Horton
2 years
@buschvalentine Working for us is preferable to fighting for us. I’m tired of hearing office seekers saying they will fight for us! By the way my Great Grandfather, Frederick Valentine Horton,mother was Keziah Valentine.
0
0
1
@showmeblues
Blue Bark
2 years
@buschvalentine Tell me you don’t understand your privilege & working folks without telling me you’ve never depended on a paycheck.
0
0
9
@GarriguesGeorge
George Garrigues
2 years
@buschvalentine Best wishes. How do you feel about the Supreme Court taking rights away from female persons?
0
0
0
@westbywest
Ben West
2 years
@buschvalentine The windfall members of Congress enjoy from investments informed by their activities in office usually dwarfs their compensation - declining compensation is ultimately a vacant gesture. Following through on the trading ban would not be vacant, so why not just focus on that?
0
0
2
@JoeAnselmo6
Joe Anselmo
2 years
@buschvalentine Interesting. Tell me more
0
0
0
@allonthemove
Democracy on the Move
2 years
@buschvalentine Take the salary, please. There are so many people that would make good politicians, but they cannot afford to do it for free. You would set a bad precedent by refusing a salary. You can donate the salary to a scholarship. Maybe pay for 5 - 10 people to get through college.
0
0
5
@13171318
Richard Hayes
2 years
@buschvalentine Take the salary . You will earn it.
0
0
1
@LA_Crystal
Crystal
2 years
@buschvalentine It isn't exactly a plus that you're wealthy enough to not need a salary.
0
0
1