Dear $ICP community, please take a moment to show your support for @KongSwapX listing on DexScreener. Support can be given in the dex-listing channel in their discord server, where there is a pending item for Kong Swap. Maybe this will help bring back to @ICPSwap feed.

Hyperliquid ✅ Aster ✅ Let's keep the ball rolling! You can request $ICP listing on Drift in their discord https://t.co/W4PtIZMjhX #ICP

The CoinDesk 20 is currently trading at 3478.84, down 4.0% (-145.03) since 4 p.m. ET on Friday. One of 20 assets is trading higher. Leaders: $ICP (+35.0%) and $POL (-1.6%) Laggards: $SUI (-8.6%) and $CRO (-7.9%). https://t.co/UjPXqmA9ir

$PIGGY Is Live🎉 We’re officially launched our token $PIGGY🔥 Piggycell, Korea’s #1 shared power-bank network, tokenizes real charging data from 100,000+ batteries and 4M+ paid users on-chain across BNB/ICP to power a transparent, verifiable RWA token economy. • Ticker: $PIGGY

PrimeVault integrated ICP's signer standards in their institutional-grade custody solution – the same standards that drive clear-signing in Oisy and the Ledger hardware wallet. One implementation, all covered! They've just announced a $200k grant program to supercharge ICP Defi!

#Caffeine is here! If you haven’t tried it yet, head to https://t.co/PdOh65EAte and give it a shot! And don’t forget to let me know what you built!

Watch out for the first SEV enabled nodes on the ICP network ... later this month!

In summary: SEV was always planned as an additional layer of protection in ICP. The existing mechanisms will all remain in place. And together with those (which include protecting physical access and using threshold cryptography), SEV remains a great improvement.

to be performed simultaneously on many different nodes, on site in data centers that have strict access control and video surveillance. This requires circumventing many different security mechanisms all at the same time.

... what about physical access? ICP nodes are operated by independent node providers and hosted in independent data centers all over the planet. The nodes within each subnet use threshold cryptography to protect precious data. This means to be effective, an attack would have

The impact of the attacks is indeed brutal. But they require physical access – attaching (surprisingly cheap) custom devices to the memory bus. Without physical access and these custom devices, however, nothing changes. The security level is the same as before. So ...

Researchers published new attacks on Intel's SGX and AMD's SEV earlier this week. What does that mean for DFINITY's plans for supporting SEV on #ICP nodes? tl;dr: No change in plans, it's still a significant improvement of security. More context in this 🧵

Is running SQLite on #ICP really efficient? What can you squeeze out of a 40-billion-instruction update call? It turns out, a LOT. Not the most scientific evaluation, but I think we can safely say that SQLite on ICP has legs. You run it: https://t.co/QOdmoGijuD

We’re super happy to have partnered with @_zondax_ for the ICP app on @Ledger, their proficiency in building on hardware wallets is what makes such groundbreaking features possible!

What does that mean concretely, though? You'll be able to do swapping, providing liquidity, lending, borrowing – everything that touches big amounts of your tokens – with the full security of your Ledger HW! Keep control of your tokens, at the highest level of security!

The mechanism is super scalable: the network can easily support tens of thousands of such transactions per second. It's also easy to integrate for dapps, since it builds on the existing wallet integrations.

This is why we developed the generic clear-signing method for ICP! At its core, it builds on chain-key cryptography. Each smart contract can determine how the transactions it supports should be rendered – protected through canister signatures – and the HW validates correctness.

One effect of this is that people started to blind-sign unsupported transactions with their hardware wallets. This of course undermines the entire security designed into them, and lead to people losing funds despite using a HW. Blind signing should not even be an option!

on your HW, your funds are safe. To get that level of security, HWs have intentionally restricted functionality. They cannot connect to the Internet, and apps installed need to be vetted for security. This makes update cycles somewhat slow and cumbersome – by design!

The distinguishing feature of a HW is that it allows you to validate the details of a transaction on a trusted device before you decide to sign off on it. Even if your computer is infested with malware and remote-controlled by Lazarus: as long as you validate transaction details