TRAs: nobody wants to erase the word "woman", we're just being inclusive
The media:
31
117
510
Replies
@awomaniswhen
Because it's not just women who can become pregnant and that expanded definition is not limited to trans men.
It also includes people from cultures reclaiming their traditional heritage after years of colonisation and religious oppression.
14
0
1
@GCticky
Yes because transmen are men. Many Twitter accounts with anime profile pictures have told me so.
0
0
5
@awomaniswhen
Wonder why 'men' isn't considered exclusive and transphobic? Only the use of women is. It's a puzzle indeed 🤔🤦🏻♀️
0
1
12
@awomaniswhen
@NoName_xx_ahf
funny how the word women is changed to "pregnant people" but the word men stays the same....where's the consideration for "men" that don't have the necessary "means" to make someone pregnant? where's the outrage for their hurt feelz??? surely it should be "sperm producers"???
1
1
33
@awomaniswhen
@CaptainVirgilx
It should say:
'Ohio bill would allow pregnant people to sue their impregnators for unintended pregnancies.'
0
2
12
@awomaniswhen
Identifying as a woman and being a woman are two different things . This is something people need to understand.
Before we have this argument on inclusiveness, people need to have a strong definition on what it means to be a woman.
1
0
5
@awomaniswhen
@Juelue1
Where are all the TRAs demanding that people include transwomen whenever they talk about men?
Or could it be that they just don't want the word 'woman' to be used if they're not included.
0
1
6
@awomaniswhen
Saving for the next time they say "that doesn't happen"
And wondering why one of their top three tactics (with narcissistic threats and "poor me") is gaslighting 🥴
0
0
2