@xxdbreezyxx
no but like they said they were near you, they wanted to hang out, but no later than 4pm, so maybe sooner. Then you said 6. They couldn't do that cause they said no later than 4. it's really not their fault here lol
15
33
2K
Replies
@awesomemikaila
@xxdbreezyxx
Right. They would have to kill 2+ hours just waiting til you’re available at 6? Please lol it was very straight forward
0
1
196
@awesomemikaila
@xxdbreezyxx
ehh it wouldn’t have been their fault if they just said “no 6 is too late. can we do…?” but they playin talkin bout some i’ll see wassup 🙃
0
0
0
@awesomemikaila
Precisely! He's free to hang out 4pm and under. If he gotta wait two more hours, he don't wanna to or may not be available. It's super simple. Lol
0
0
10
@awesomemikaila
@xxdbreezyxx
So I read that as like "no. later" like "not 4, later than." Then he switched it up to "maybe sooner" then just landed eventually on "I'll see" 💀
1
0
27
@awesomemikaila
@xxdbreezyxx
They literally gave all the information he needed to kno 6 wasnt gone work 😂😂
0
0
12
@awesomemikaila
@xxdbreezyxx
Then why say “I’ll see wassup?” Why not confirm that 6pm is too late and plan for another day? “Oh damn that’s not going to work. When are you free tomorrow?”
1
0
15
@awesomemikaila
@xxdbreezyxx
Thank you! Critical reading is lacking. It would’ve been different if they said “no, later”.
0
0
0
