There are three types of people: 1) i++ 2) i+=1 3) i=i+1

@adamnash Those are religious extremists.

@adamnash @tunguz ++i is to sophisticated for most people

@adamnash @tunguz Living on the edge!

@adamnash I was going to comment it.

@orochi_69_666 @tunguz

@adamnash @tunguz Stroustrup jokes that he prefers pre-increment, too - “with the proper nomenclature it’s ++C”

@adamnash @tunguz I don't write code that is dependent on the order of pre/post-increment. There were a few times where I swear it wasn't behaving as expected, and I broke my logic and arithmetic into separate lines. Probably I was making some other error, still can't bring myself to do it.

@adamnash @tunguz These four operations do different things. You should use the one appropriate for the situation rather than just blindly always using a favourite.

@adamnash @tunguz No, cause then often u would end up scratching ur head where th extra loop coming from

@adamnash @tunguz Who even uses ++i?

@adamnash @tunguz If “i” is a C++ object with the overload operator “Type& operator++();”, ++i can be faster than i ++ because it return the current value quote and the i++ return the value of i before inc, so i++ need to copy the value before inc. That’s why I love ++i

@adamnash @tunguz Indian level

@adamnash @tunguz It is odd that no one does that

@adamnash @tunguz That's #0