@HansMahncke
@nytimes
So let me get this straight- the FBI took Igor Danchenkos word when it came anonymously through the Steele Dossier, disbelieved him when he recanted, made him a paid CHS anyway, and assumed the Russian intercepts were a Russian ploy. This is fucking mind bending bullshit.
This entire article is mind numbingly dishonest. All of it. Here's just one example:
@nytimes
equates the fact that the intelligence community illegally spied on a presidential campaign and presidency under false pretenses with Durham chasing down memos from Dutch intelligence.
@TrustIsEarnd
@HansMahncke
@nytimes
Isn't this pretty much what we've learned about FBI/DOJ 'justice' in general? Partisan (or downright corrupt) hacks deciding when to aggressively pursue vs willfully ignore evidence?