@Tiggersdad2
A Progressive Libertarian
4 years
@ACTBrigitte My first instinct was to mock this tweet, but I’m feeling empathetic tonight. Instead, I will just point you to the fact that the Supreme Court is an appellate court not a trial court. The only cases it would ever hear “at trial” would be issues between states.
8
1
167

Replies

@ACTBrigitte
Brigitte Gabriel
4 years
WE THE PEOPLE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT TO THE SUPREME COURT! WHO’S IN?
2K
3K
14K
@Tiggersdad2
A Progressive Libertarian
4 years
@ACTBrigitte Further, in its ruling yesterday, it made very clear that the action brought by Texas was not something they were willing to hear, save for Alito and Thomas whose policy is to accept all such cases. However, even they said they would not grant relief.
5
1
138
@twinelm
NEVER AGAIN 🟦🍊
4 years
@Tiggersdad2 @ACTBrigitte Which the Texas suit was...
1
0
0
@Tiggersdad2
A Progressive Libertarian
4 years
@twinelm @ACTBrigitte I addressed that in my 2nd tweet. The Court still didn’t want to hear it and the tweet I was responding to was soliciting a ridiculous class action that could never be brought directly.
0
0
1
@JamesCastleton3
James Castleton
4 years
@Tiggersdad2 @ACTBrigitte Would it be possible to have a trial at a convention of the states?
1
0
0
@Tiggersdad2
A Progressive Libertarian
4 years
@gimpthelimp @ACTBrigitte So did you not see my second tweet or did you just ignore it to make your point? The Supreme Court itself said yesterday that this was not a dispute they were willing to review. And no states broke their own laws. That’s why Trump and his allies are 1 and 58 in court.
0
0
2
@brightooth
Patriot Dentist
4 years
@Tiggersdad2 @ACTBrigitte Obviously the suit would have to start at the district court level
0
0
0