If Jermell Charlo isn’t on your P4P top 10 list, the list is TRASH.
56
57
462
Replies
@The1stWright
Nonsense! He should NOT on the top ten list. He isn’t consistent enough. Two words: Castano and Harrison. Tank, Crawford and Spence are all better overall fighters.
2
0
10
@The1stWright
End of round 3 Castano v Charlo 1, Charlo is literally almost out and down on the canvas. Now grow Charlo to even just 160 and have him be in that position with anyone really on the top ten (or even say GGG) and you got a knockout. That weight class isn’t even full of talent.
2
0
1
@jjeremymeyers
Canelo was buzzed just like that Vs Cotto brother. We holding that against him too?
3
0
0
@The1stWright
Stop this narrative i love charlo but lost to tony harrison rather you agree or not, arguably lost to brian castano 1 but ended up a draw. Jus like when canelo lost your gonna go down on the list
3
0
5
@tee_the_creator
You sound crazy. If this is what we doing you better not have Lomachenko, Estrada or Canelo on your list either and he’s beat them both by stoppage.
Using your logic, if you’re not undefeated they you can’t be on the list lol
1
0
3
@The1stWright
My list is trash then, no problem rather have a trash list than include someone who lost to Harrison and Castaño.
2
0
3
@The1stWright
Becasue for all of his talent and great power, good skill, he’s poor tactically and therefore despite his abilities isn’t a lock to win any fight against other top 5 fighters. I can understand why that would inhibit peoples ranking of him on lists
1
0
0
@The1stWright
P4p is subjective/mythical in nature. Resume is important, but the idea it to take weight out of the equation, go off is skills/style, and say who would win. Style wise and based on the eyeball test, I don’t see it. He can be outboxed and his power won’t bail him out every time.
1
0
0
