@Sompaulinsky @mattkratter @KaspaCurrency Yes. At no point in the video does it say that BTC is not divisible. Gold is not as abundant as silver. Historically gold became the money of kings and silver became the peoples money because gold was cumbersome for day to day transactions. Tweet added by Kaspa Key 𐤊 @TMcbesty

Kaspa Key 𐤊

2 months

@Sompaulinsky @mattkratter @KaspaCurrency Yes. At no point in the video does it say that BTC is not divisible. Gold is not as abundant as silver. Historically gold became the money of kings and silver became the peoples money because gold was cumbersome for day to day transactions.

0

4

Kaspa Key 𐤊

@TMcbesty

3 months

New! Why Kaspa? (Official Edit) I would like to thank the #Kaspa community and team for their input and suggestions. @KaspaCurrency

59

341

783

Matthew R. Kratter

@mattkratter

2 months

@TMcbesty @KaspaCurrency Thanks for sharing, but extremely misleading video. It conflates final settlement networks like BTC with credit card networks, which are not the base layer (in this case, FedWire is). Also the same stupid BS about gold/silver. BTC doesn't have divisibility problems

4

5

57

Som Paul in s𐤊y

@Sompaulinsky

2 months

@mattkratter @TMcbesty @KaspaCurrency BTC is indeed divisible, arguing that it has no divisibility issues overlooks practical concerns in microtransaction and fee structures, especially as the network grows and trans fees fluctuate. Consider these complexities rather than labeling the comparison as simply misleading.

1

0

3

Replies