You mean he didn't cost a first and Matthew Knies? Shocking.
So it begs the question, WTF and how did Tre not land him?
#LeafsForever
31
0
41
Replies
@TMLeafsForever
If Calgary was retaining no $ tough fit.
I saw the Ownership in Calgary did want to
1
0
2
@Huddy77792744
Lots of ways to make it happen starting with burying Reaves. Only need another 2.6M to go the other way or trade somewhere else.
2
0
0
@TMLeafsForever
I’m thinking they’ll wait for full story on klingberg before making a significant add
2
0
2
@TMLeafsForever
Because he knows deep down, he wasn't the answer. Zadorov isn't much better than a healthy Klingberg . Taney on the other hand would be great
1
0
3
@Blueliner112
I really am hoping it's for a real big fish.
I think he still needs probably more than one though and both being solid, stay at home types that like the bang and clear the front of the net.
1
0
0
@MikeABuchanan
Definitely would have needed to make a move like Vancouver did earlier in the week.
0
0
0
@TMLeafsForever
Couldn’t afford him, would have needed salary retention and that would have cost a 1st which he isn’t worth
1
0
1
@TMLeafsForever
Here is my optimistic take (full disclosure- I thought Zadorov was the wrong guy for our team), but maybe Tre is chasing a much bigger fish for our backend.
1
0
1
@SledgePlayer15
Van traded a guy to create space, there's always options. It's not a big deal though.
0
0
0