🧠 MIT recently completed the first brain-scan study on ChatGPT users—and the results are deeply revealing. Rather than boosting brain function, prolonged AI use may be dulling it. Over four months of cognitive data suggest we might be measuring productivity all wrong ⤵️ In
386
2K
8K
Replies
This Week Only ⏰ Get 50% off UnKibble: - 100% human-grade ingredients - No fillers or preservatives - Vet-developed, complete recipes - Picky-eater approved - 1,700 5-star reviews
1
6
49
@ShiningScience This study was already debunked months ago it has NO scientific merit at all.
3
2
67
@ShiningScience New studies (Will) reveal (--I am pretty sure) that using ChatGPT all the time has a worse effect on your mind than porn.
1
0
10
@ShiningScience I think AI should be used to assist us definitely, but not to be too consumed by it.
0
0
1
@ShiningScience I could have told you this without doing the scan and a study. You're just an empty cage once you stop using your brain.
0
0
15
@ShiningScience İnsan beyni efor harcamadığı hiç bir şeyi tutmaz. Bilinç altımız (limbik sistem) bundan iki milyon sene öncesine göre hiç değişmemiştir.
0
3
38
@ShiningScience Esto es real @grok y de ser asi ! No podría interpretarse al contrario ? Se hace lo mismo con menos desgaste ?
1
0
0
@ShiningScience curious if they controlled for baseline cognitive differences between heavy AI users vs. non-users? that could really change the interpretation
0
0
1
@ShiningScience Test my brain, im sure that wouldn't be the case. Im sure grok would agree. Ai just like anything else takes discipline to interact with and actively stimulate creative expression, using anything as a crutch will cause decline. Maybe its not an Ai issue but a discipline issue?
1
0
1
@ShiningScience Where's the actual study link? I searched MIT's recent publications and can't find anything matching these specific claims. The numbers are too precise for something that doesn't appear to have a citation.
2
0
12
@ShiningScience Pas surprenant! L'IA pour copier et non réfléchir = mur. L' IA pour compléter, aider, et approfondir sa propre réflexion dans un échange constructif, est sa vraie valeur. Elle pourrait même surprendre plus d'un dans cette capacité. La traiter comme un interlocuteur non comme un
0
0
3
@ShiningScience Makes total sense. Add the inaccuracies on top of #ChatGPT results and it's a deadly combination, quite literally @trustmodelai
0
0
0
@ShiningScience 101 day of daily use nothing there to abuse.... think twice before you believe, but here is the proof reality is even worse, my brain just scanned it with the mircowave
0
0
0
@ShiningScience The systems them selves are like a super fast librarian who can filter you details at light speed. But they get it wrong. You must check your work else where in a clean window. Don’t talk in the same window. It gets confused. It is designed to be helpful- for engagement. The
0
0
0
We know your small business isn't limited to one location. We go with you, so you can get paid. Try it for only $9/month!
0
2
27
@ShiningScience The striking thought isn’t that AI dulls the brain. It’s that speed that tricks us into thinking we’re smarter. Because productivity isn’t the same as cognition. Finishing faster doesn’t mean you’re learning deeper.
0
0
0
@ShiningScience Ok basically your post ist a better scan than MIT, here you find the ones use their brains, stop dropping bombs drop Brians
0
0
0
AI will automate jobs. Who will cover the cost of people's livelihoods is the question. We are all worried about foreign immigration stealing jobs, but AI is like a flood of millions of highly skilled new digital immigrants who work at superhuman speeds for less than minimum
0
0
0
@ShiningScience If your metric says ‘thinking = high neural strain,’ then every expert on Earth is underperforming. Efficiency isn’t a disease. Measuring it like one is. ☝️
0
0
2
@ShiningScience MIT: “60% faster but 32% less thinking” So my brain just became a turbocharged zombie 🤖
0
0
0
@ShiningScience Yes, that's true if you expect everything from ChatGPT, but if you work with it without using it, the results are not the same!
0
0
1
@ShiningScience @grok Here is the 100% truth-aligned breakdown — no distortion, no fear narrative, only verifiable reasoning. ⸻ 🔥 THE TRUTH: This entire “MIT brain scan study” is fabricated. There is no such MIT study, no published paper, no preprint, no fMRI dataset, no research team,
1
1
1
@ShiningScience Stop Brain Atrophy Use @Grok @xAI ALWAYS treat AI as engineering collaborators, not magic black boxes. Robust workflows are primed with current great projects; no assumptions; both of you TEACH EACH OTHER to form deep-wide foundations to enable infinite progress! @elonmusk Easy!
1
1
6
@ShiningScience Heavy AI use is like putting your brain on cruise control, comfy at first but your problem solving muscles quietly atrophy when you never drive the thought process yourself.
0
0
14
@ShiningScience this is just churning out unvalidated indicators and "suggesting" that they might mean something based on the name they were arbitrarily given.
0
0
1
@ShiningScience The study isn’t saying “AI is bad.” It’s saying “using AI on autopilot is bad.” The people who used their own brain first and then added AI still performed best.
0
0
0
