@RnaudBertrand The “some” here most likely means Big Pharma.

@BrianTycangco 🎯

@RnaudBertrand So unfair! This is Joe’s job!

@RnaudBertrand Curing cancer is problematic for the pharma industry. They need time to develop other sources of revenue, e.g. create a new disease.

@RnaudBertrand For the amoral ... cures are not conducive to maintaining profit streams ...

@RnaudBertrand This is another “but at what cost”?

@RnaudBertrand Slow down means don't make any new treatment cheap.

@RnaudBertrand . "But at what cost?" The FDA has approved 2 cancer drugs from China to be used domestically. The price in the US is 10x of that in China. It shows how greedy Big Pharma is.

@RnaudBertrand Bloomberg has many whacky interpretations of good things 🤡

@RnaudBertrand BAWC! 😂

@RnaudBertrand ‘China cures lung cancer, but at what cost?’

@RnaudBertrand This past year has shown that western media is more propaganda than not.

@RnaudBertrand But at what cost ? -:)

@RnaudBertrand Wow. Bravo!

@RnaudBertrand 🤣🤣🤣

@RnaudBertrand I’m so worried that people may not suffer their fair share, yes.

@RnaudBertrand but at what cost

@RnaudBertrand Why cure when you can drag out the treatment and milked them off all their families' worth.

@RnaudBertrand Too fast curing cancer? Big pharma not making enough eh?

@RnaudBertrand I'm getting a sense of Deja Vu.....