The Baltimore Museum of Art is now the leading poster child for art collection carelessness. If the sell-off to fund operations sets a precedent for other art museums, the public loss will be immense
Exploiting a brief window of opportunity created to deal with fallout from the COVID-19 tragedy, Baltimore Museum of Art director Christopher Bedford recently announced liquidation of upwards of $73 million in important paintings from its permanent collection. 1/
Last spring, AAMD, the nat’l museum directors group, relaxed its restrictions on the use of art deaccession funds. The pandemic, still new & little understood, was exploding. Art museums were closing down, and the financial future of a plummeting economy looked bleak. 2/
The directors’ organization decided that, for a two-year period, some or all art deaccession income could be used for urgent collection care. Amid the ruin the BMA saw an opening – and took it. 3/
AAMD’s president & staff director said potentially dire financial need drove the relaxed restriction. BMA, though, is facing no fiscal cliff. “We are not financially desperate,” Bedford told the Baltimore Sun, which described the museum’s endowment as robust. 4/
For 40 years, ever since the Reagan era’s fetid dawn, we’ve built an increasingly unequal society on the lie that the market will solve all our problems – a lie that the Baltimore Museum of Art's sleazy deaccession maneuver still accepts /6
@KnightLAT
Another worrisome but different situation of a museum’s prizing building over collection is LACMA where Michel Govin’s hubris has a Zumthor amoebic structure costing over $750,000,000. with 20% less space for the collection and curvilinear, unfriendly walls for hanging art.