@DanielGarb Spurs? Title challengers? United are only 3 points behind them.

@asoufan96 Title challengers/big teams however you want to phrase it.

@DanielGarb If Mike Powell didn’t compete in the 1991 World Champs, Carl Lewis would have broken Bob Beamon’s freak long jump world record and won gold. Instead, he got silver 🤷🏼‍♂️

@adampeacock3 So just like Liverpool and City this year, a freakishly talented field.

@DanielGarb Cool story. What do you think about Salah's cheating though?

@the_kumul He eventuated the fall. Still a blatant pen.

@DanielGarb Lol at spurs being title challengers

@MaasdorpJR Big team/title challengers however you want to phrase it.

@DanielGarb What a pointless tweet

@haydenratcliffe Not really. Underlines how brilliant both have been.

@DanielGarb Also spent just 1m pounds on Jens Lehmann for that season and were out spent by a distance by Chelsea, United, Newcastle and Liverpool, and didn't lose a game, made semi finals of the domestic cups and UCL quarters (should have won the damn thing). There's just no comparison.

@MaasdorpJR It's not about comparing it's about underlying how brilliant City and Liverpool have been.

@DanielGarb Spurs were title challengers for like a week mate, give it up

@MitchellWhiley Title challengers in title not form this season. I.E a more difficult league than 03/04

@DanielGarb Did u just call Spurs Title challengers?

@Deiza3069 Big team would have been the more accurate term

@DanielGarb Might it not be the increasingly lopsided nature of the competition that allows points to be amassed rather than the particular brilliance of two teams?

@Phil_Hawkins_ They've made it lopsided

@DanielGarb @nomad56060053 Two extra? Spurs were never in the title race. So really it’s the same. Liverpool have City as challengers, arsenal had United 🤷🏻‍♂️

@antonymmartin84 @nomad56060053 Two extra big teams I meant, title challengers wrong term