DKeithClimate Profile Banner
David Keith Profile
David Keith

@DKeithClimate

Followers
10K
Following
908
Media
567
Statuses
3K

Climate science and technology policy since 1989. Building Climate Systems Engineering @UChicago. Founded Carbon Engineering. Bluesky: @davidkeith.bsky.social

2/3 Chicago & 1/3 Canmore
Joined September 2015
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
1 year
New paper: "Solar Geoengineering: History, Methods, Governance, Prospects" by @parson_ted & me in Annual Reviews. Full text at: https://t.co/tMzbu7RZrW I am particularly proud of this paper. This thread provides some highlights: 1/8
24
19
50
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
12 days
Daniele Visioni and I explain our concerns about Stardust and the commercialization of climate engineering in Technology Review: https://t.co/im4VY3QsyN
Tweet card summary image
technologyreview.com
Two scientists argue that the growing commercial efforts to counter climate change by reflecting away sunlight will thwart responsible research in the field.
0
4
9
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
2 months
One can imagine this rule is simple enough to be useful in international negotiations over sunlight reflection. My prior NYT op-ed's on this topic: https://t.co/XFxHiRlvXQ, and https://t.co/X8spwHU2If 4/4
nytimes.com
The melting of the polar ice cap in recent years is decades ahead of model predictions, raising concern that climate change is proving worse than expected.
0
3
3
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
2 months
First, it ties use of SRM to clean up of pollution, and since this pollution is mostly from burning fossil fuels, this is roughly equivalent to tying use of SRM to cuts in fossil fuels; and second, it provides a non-arbitrary fixed upper limit on how much SRM can be deployed. 3/4
1
2
2
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
2 months
Zeke and I propose a simple rule: limit use of SRM to maintaining Earth’s reflectivity against the decrease in reflectivity that will continue as pollution is cleaned up. This rule has two useful consequences. 2/4
1
2
2
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
5 months
@DegreesNGO @hollyjeanbuck @MutisoRose And Holly Buck is a powerful writer on geoengineering. See her book "After Geoengineering." Also, her article "The Rise of Green MAGA" is essential reading for the current political environment: https://t.co/GnoFf84Mtw Here's Holly on our pod:
Tweet card summary image
energyvsclimate.com
Conspiratorial-environmentalism’s connection to climate and geoengineering; the anti-vax movement; and what it tells us about mainstream environmentalism and climate politics. David and Ed chat with...
2
2
1
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
5 months
@DegreesNGO @hollyjeanbuck @MutisoRose Rose Mutiso is a great rising voice in the climate and energy space, and I recently spoke with her about the energy transition in Africa on my Energy vs Climate podcast: https://t.co/MEbHWAdvjM Rose's Ted Talk on the subject is also a must watch:
2
1
1
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
5 months
@DegreesNGO @hollyjeanbuck @MutisoRose The conversation focused on SRM in context, alongside carbon removal, adaptation, and emissions cuts. We need to evaluate how they might work together in our messy world, a topic that's on my mind every day as I write a book that tackles this question.
1
1
1
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
5 months
Enjoyed Cape Town last month at the @DegreesNGO Forum 2025. I had the pleasure of joining @hollyjeanbuck and @MutisoRose for a plenary session on how sunlight reflection methods (SRM) fit into the broader climate response toolbox. #DGF2025
3
7
11
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
6 months
@LisaD144 @EnvDefenseFund @CanAccelerator @DougMacMartin Canada can’t just sit on the sidelines regarding SRM research and governance. Ignoring SRM means others will make the decisions. Here’s an old op-ed Ted Parson and I wrote for the Globe & Mail that makes this point: https://t.co/JP8dudDqli (not our headline)
Tweet card summary image
davidkeith.earth
At the time of this post, David Keith was a professor in Harvard's Schools of Engineering and of Public Policy, and founder at Carbon Engineering. Edward Parson is professor and co-director of the...
3
3
2
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
6 months
@LisaD144 @EnvDefenseFund @CanAccelerator @DougMacMartin Lisa Dilling (@LisaD144) leads SRM research at the Environmental Defense Fund and has written about the need to explore the potential impacts of SRM before any sort of deployment is considered: https://t.co/7SMWLK78vT
Tweet card summary image
blogs.edf.org
The impacts from climate change will continue to escalate in the years ahead, and a growing number of scientists, philanthropies and companies have become interested in strategies to lower global...
3
0
2
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
6 months
@LisaD144 @EnvDefenseFund @CanAccelerator This conversation grew out of meetings that several Canadian SRM leaders, including Ted Parson and @DougMacMartin, had with Canadian government officials and NGOs about a possible SRM research program in Canada.
1
0
1
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
6 months
Can Canada afford to ignore sunlight reflection methods (SRM)? I’m joining @LisaD144 from the @EnvDefenseFund for a discussion hosted by The Transition Accelerator (@CanAccelerator), a major Canadian NGO focused on the climate. June 10, 12pm ET. Join:
Tweet card summary image
transitionaccelerator.ca
Should Canada act now to build its SRM research capacity and leadership? How can we foster the local expertise and international partnerships we’ll need to control the technology should solar...
2
4
4
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
6 months
Superb op-ed from Steven Pinker (@sapinker on X) calling out the right's absurd Harvard Derangement Syndrome. Harvard has some woke, but its peak has passed, and claims of many on the right are disconnected from the reality I saw as a faculty member. https://t.co/TLGxOeRsUV
2
0
11
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
6 months
I appreciate the way Andreas has made a careful case for strong actions such as civil disobedience to protect humans and nature. Looking fwd having Andreas join us on Energy vs Climate this morning. (Feel free to join us live) https://t.co/VJiLzIHcCH
0
1
3
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
6 months
@bodanskydm See, the concluding section of the article, "If not a negotiated moratorium, then what?” for practical thinking on how governance can move forward without halting research progress.
0
0
1
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
6 months
@bodanskydm States can begin research programs while making it clear that deployment is premature. This allows for bottom-up norm setting and transparency without the risks of a negotiated moratorium.
1
0
1
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
6 months
@bodanskydm Many people, including (sometimes) me, have argued that a moratorium could provide a safe space under which research can flourish. But a moratorium would not magically create research. And as Sue and Dan point out, there are many ways in which a moratorium might inhibit research.
1
0
1
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
6 months
Smart argument against a moratorium for deployment of sunlight reflection SRM, from Sue Biniaz (former top US climate negotiator) and @bodanskydm (environmental lawyer). https://t.co/Xfpchtv9Zd
Tweet card summary image
justsecurity.org
A bottom-up norm-setting approach would rectify the concerns of agreeing to a global moratorium on solar radiation management deployment.
1
3
4
@DKeithClimate
David Keith
6 months
New high-quality survey on public attitudes toward sunlight reflection in Great Britain: 16% support SAI deployment. 46% are unsure. Younger people are more supportive overall. Interesting signals on awareness and openness to geoengineering in general. https://t.co/IdpF5wOIqx
Tweet card summary image
yougov.co.uk
Most Britons say a drastic change in the steps taken to combat climate change is needed in order to avert its worst effects
2
4
8