Why another protocol?
@ConvexFinance
is optimal for boosted $CRV emissions. But has downsides:
1. LPs need to stake Curve LP tokens
2. Pool TVL, asset balances, and $CRV emissions are constantly changing. Making committing to a single Curve pool challenging long term
2/
Conic Finance solves this ๐ซ
Conic makes it simple to:
1. Deposit a single asset to Curve
2. Receive exposure to multiple Curve pools
3. Benefit from automatic Curve pool rebalancing
4. Receive $CRV, $CVX and $CNC
4/
What are Omnipools?
Conic Omnipools are liquidity pools which deposit one asset across multiple
@CurveFinance
pools. Conic then stakes Curve LP tokens directly on
@ConvexFinance
Conic LP token holders receive $CRV and $CVX earnings from multiple Curve pools
5/
How does Conic Finance governance differ from
@ConvexFinance
?
๐ $vlCVX: vote on $CRV emissions
๐ $vlCNC: vote on
@CurveFinance
liquidity distribution
7/
$vlCVX and $vlCNC holders control two different levers ๐ง
With $vlCVX controlling $CRV emissions per pool, $vlCNC introduces controlling liquidity per pool
8/