Citeret Videnskab
@CiteretV
Followers
107
Following
13K
Media
34
Statuses
2K
Send me your best vaccine safety studies https://t.co/IrNm3CqYW2
Pubmed
Joined July 2020
Once again, RT-PCR proven to be unreliable for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. Yet @OSHA_DOL is about to mandate testing of millions of people. Expect a fifth wave of millions of cases - so unrealistic the #COSTOFTHEFALSEPOSITIVE and CDC's fatal flaws will be known to all.
These are called reinfections when only a PCR test is done. Not so fast. “Viral culture was negative in all 108 individuals with re-positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test results in whom viral culture was performed.”
0
6
15
On today's Unbreaking Science episode, Steve Kirsch discussed how Janet Woodcock (FDA) has failed to investigate fraud in the Pfizer trial. YT, of course, removed the content. Now on Bitchute - Steve Kirsch on Unbreaking Science. #WWDNYK #MaddieDeGaray
https://t.co/rjqwVuazMZ
10
201
306
I cant believe that I have to tell grown adults that get all the vaccines except the covid one that the government mandating any vaccines is bad. Even the ones they agree with because it sets the precedence to mandate the ones they may not want to get.
8
23
170
Why would an EUA for C19 vax for 5-11 yo be given, w/o any efficacy and <long-term> safety studies? Why is it OK to accept efficacy based on seroconversion, when Ab status for naturally immune are not accepted? We need an explanation... @US_FDA @CDCDirector @Surgeon_General
141
1K
4K
@gerdosi @AnImmunologist @vipintukur Just found this paper. The ex of Gardasil interesting: Gardasil 4 followed by Gardasil 9 means less response to the 5 new epitopes. This would support that spike protein based vaccines would prevent development of broad response to the rest of the virus?
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The concept of original antigenic sin (OAS) was put forth many years ago to explain how humoral memory responses generated against one set of antigens can affect the nature of antibody responses...
3
7
21
Their pathology may be different but both involve injury to the brain and share many of the same suspected environmental causes.
0
0
0
Why are illnesses like alzheimers and parkinsons considered diseases, but neurodevelopmental disorders that can be just as debilitating are considered "neurodiverse". Ppl often get offended when neurodevelopmental disorders are called diseases, which I dont understand.
1
0
0
So by nature of their fast-tracked and anticipated EUA status, Covid vaccine clinical trials have inevitably compromised their scientific validity. Continuing the studies long-term will not solve these problems.
0
0
0
The issue with this is that drop outs are non-random and introduce selection bias, since subjects who choose to drop out of the trial may have different predisposed risk factors to adverse events than those who choose to stay in the trial.
1
0
0
One overarching problem with covid vaccine clinical trials that noone talks about is that EUA will inadvertently affect the studies since subjects in the placebo group who wanted to receive the vaccine will drop out so they can receive the vaccine outside of the trial
2
0
1
If someone believes that the companies and organizations conducting the trials are not being transparent about the contents in the placebo, that's one thing. But it's not reasonable to jump to the conclusion that the placebo is another vaccine without evidence indicating so
0
0
0
While there is a strong tendency for vaccine clinical trials not to use saline placebos, I think Israel is mislead about Pfizer and Moderna's trials. Unless he provides evidence that shows they used something other than saline solution, the placebo is saline as we know it.
@AlexBerenson @moderna_tx @pfizer Let’s also tell people about this so-called placebo, Alex. It’s not a placebo whatsoever. It’s a previously approved vaccine. Most people think it’s being tested against a saline injection. That is not true. That never happens with vaccine testing.
1
0
0
Technically, that SAE rate was based only on dose 1, but dose 1 is all that we have so far for safety testing beyond a month.
0
0
0
and thats only looking at short-term ailments. Long-term serious risks may include pathogenic priming when exposed to the actual SARS COV 2 virus, and autoimmunity mediated through sustained elevation in IL-21. Vaccine targeted epitopes cross-reacting may also induce autoimmunity
0
0
0
Pfizer's vaccine seems to have done nothing to reduce serious adverse events compared to saline placebo. 0.5% vs 0.4% SAE rate. Based on this data, it's possible and maybe even likely that the vaccine actually caused an increase in SAE in 0.1% of subjects; 1/1000 serious injuries
2
0
0
@lifebiomedguru "Generally side effects from vaccines show up within two months" Animal models conducted by independent researchers studying vaccine injury beg to differ. Damage in HepB mice studies for example wasn't observable until the human equivalent of decades had passed
0
6
11
People who spread rumours about unsupported risks diminish the credibility of REAL risks of mRNA vaccines, since they will be associated with the same kinds of people. It's so important to be accurate!
0
0
0
Of course this does not prove causation and I'm a massive critique of cohort studies myself, but what we do know is that observational studies tend to favor underestimation of risk so when safety signals are identified, they should be taken seriously
0
0
0