@RCMACisback
@realTanyaTay
Not in this case. Instead they found a shady local federal magistrate (a notch below a judge) with ties to Jeffrey Epstein, to sign off on this I’ll-conceived raid. A violation of 250 years of precedent, and a further erosion of public trust. Black eye for the FBI.
@realTanyaTay
In Russia they did it on KGB orders which came from the top with no rules or warrants. We use due process here, a prosecutor or in this case the FBI has to approach a judge with probable cause and if the judge sees the merit in the PC, he will issue a warrant. 1/2
@Barry4the44th
Hi Barry,
That's false.
A) Perhaps you haven't noticed, but nobody has closer ties to Epstein than tRump.
B) The "shady" magistrate was appointed by tRump.
C) The FBI director was was hand-picked by tRump. Imagine how bad the evidence must be for both to sign off on it.
@RockSolidBWalk
For purposes of your further education, I will point out your errors. First, Clinton had close ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump barely knew him, as a guest at the Mar-a-Lago club. And threw him out permanently in 2006. Secondly, federal magistrates are not presidential appointees.
@Barry4the44th
@RCMACisback
@realTanyaTay
As for 250 years of precedent, that was 250 years of *almost* always refusing to hold Presidents accountable for the multitude of crimes that most of them committed while in office.
I’d like to see more politicians, Democrat or Republican, go to jail for corruption.
@Barry4the44th
@realTanyaTay
First off the Magistrate has an excellent record and was chosen to the bench from 64 candidates by District judges. Precedent just means some thing that happened once that until another precedent is practice. So yes Trump set a precedent as the first prez to steal documents.
@RCMACisback
@realTanyaTay
Wrong and wrong again. First, every magistrate is chosen by the judges of that particular district. Doesn't mean they are "excellent", and nothing this guy has done points to excellence.
@RCMACisback
@realTanyaTay
And you know that how? Since all we know comes from the generalized and vague list of what the FBI seized? Remember how Robert Mueller and Adam Schiff had definite proof of Trump's Russian collusion?? What came of that? So don't get too excited by leaks of what they might have.
@Barry4the44th
@realTanyaTay
Precedent? Trump set the precedent, he committed crimes that warranted a search warrant for an ex president. Anytime something is done for the first time it's a precedent, so that word is useless.
@Barry4the44th
@RCMACisback
@realTanyaTay
Those shady local federal magistrates side with Republicans about half the time or more. That’s true of both Florida and the South in general.
As for Epstein… Well, Trump was on the flight logs. He and Bill Clinton probably partied together on the island
@Barry4the44th
@realTanyaTay
So what makes Judge Reinhart shady? Because some right wing news sources wrote vague and untrue hatchet pieces? Read his law ratings and the court's press release from when he was selected for the court. Get some truth up in there bud.
@Barry4the44th
@RCMACisback
@realTanyaTay
Shady Judge sure there Einstein. One that Trump nominated? Surely you can do better than that. Trump had ties to Epstein. A truly criminal President that steals state secrets is a violation of 250 years of precedent. I/6 was not backing the blue. FBI = duty. GOP=insurrectionist