Well, that’s me told. #Vancouver

Lots of comments, esp. from leading politicians, on Court of Appeal's decision in the Epping Hotel case; it's obvious that the majority of them haven't read the judgment which concerns only the interim injunction, NOT the merits of the Council's substantive challenge.

I'm only 12 so I sniggered at this inspired piece of marketing work in #Vancouver

Hey @cannula_service , I think UMAPS is meant to file their amended JR application today to add Prof Leng, is that right?

As expected, not a lot to see in UMAPS' micro-company accounts as at 30/11/2024 -

Burning through, what £30K/£40K (?) on a failed injunction application is indeed "incredibly positive" ... for the KC, 2 juniors and a team of solicitors. Having to apply to the court for permission to amend the JR claim to add Prof Leng as the third defendant, as opposed to

Here is the FAQs referred to in my above post -

Here is the FAQs referred to in my above post -

I have just posted a summary of the UMAPS v NHSE & SoS judgment yesterday and some significant headlines. Do check it out. Below thread from @cannula_service has very nice verbatim quotes so have a look too 👇

16/8/25 [DISCLAIMER - I was working at the time of the hearing so I may have missed bits of it; below is my personal recollection and is not intended to be a definitive record] HEADLINES: 1. At the end of July, NHSE stopped changes to PCN DES contract wrt PAs not seeing undiff.

16/8/25 [DISCLAIMER - I was working at the time of the hearing so I may have missed bits of it; below is my personal recollection and is not intended to be a definitive record] HEADLINES: 1. At the end of July, NHSE stopped changes to PCN DES contract wrt PAs not seeing undiff.

Follow up - The Court will in due course have to decide, on the face of the court papers already filed (+ more to be filed by the parties, including an application by UMAPS to add Prof Leng as the third defendant because they want to challenge her "flawed" report), whether to

Follow up - The Court will in due course have to decide, on the face of the court papers already filed (+ more to be filed by the parties, including an application by UMAPS to add Prof Leng as the third defendant because they want to challenge her "flawed" report), whether to

**Breaking** UMAPS has LOST its application for an interim injunction, pending the hearing of its JR claim, to stop NHSE / SoS from implementing the Leng Recommendations. UMAPS wanted an interim injunction to preserve the current status quo (& uncertainties) pending the

For anyone interested ...

The postgraduate medical training review overseen by Powis and Whitty is meant to finalise the Diagnostic Phase 1 Report in July 2025, has anyone got any info on it?

@ReddicalMedge @dgraemestewart @medicalmodelbri @UMAPsUK @NHSEngland @wesstreeting @NHSEmployers The best statement he made was a post on LinkedIn accusing the ultimate BOSS @wesstreeting of "sheer dereliction of leadership", calling him "disgraceful", labelling the Leng Review and his acceptance thereof as "half-baked overhaul" and him adopting "full ostrich mode". *AND

ANP on my new ward introduced themselves with “I work at registrar level and a bit beyond” 🙃

GMC might have thought the Leng Review helped their JR defence ... but in rode Tom De La Mare KC and his team with this 13 page beauty 👇 https://t.co/cV0ml7SSS0