@Ahmed1Hilal
हिलाल अहमद Hilal Ahmed
5 years
A silent anti-Muslim narrative is established by bollywood films in recent years. Fight between invaders, who happened to be Muslims and Hindu rulers are glamorised as if HINDU nationalism has to be reclaimed in present context to correct the hiatorical mistakes
89
254
729

Replies

@SaralTrader
SaralTrader_Pragati
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal History must be told as is ...and if this bruises some egos so be it.
0
0
2
@thatwhoisnot
andy
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal When Gandhi film showed British atrocities in Indians during freedom struggle, that was building Anti-British sentiment or presenting history as it happened? Should Britishers demand scrapping any talk of their colonial past just because it may reflect badly on their ancestors?
0
0
2
@uttamtaurus
uttam kumar rao
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal Why you see a conspiracy when you face off history. Is this fiction or truth
0
0
0
@Shaikh_Hilal
Hilal Hathravi
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal But Muslim invaders won the battle. Then why creating a fake narrative?
0
0
0
@ShahrozeAli1213
shahroze ali
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal Since 2000 silent anti muslim narrative are being set by Bollywood
0
0
0
@Yeasmin38998598
Yeasmin
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal They also create the stereotypes which even Muslims are ignorant, like having a Tabiz, wearing round skullcap day and night, Baniyans with holes, etc. Etc. The List can go on and on.....
0
0
1
@zra_89
Zuhair
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal @AshGowariker Thank You for succumbing to the Anti-Muslim narrative of the present times. Why should anyone be left out ,Right?
2
0
1
@yakshaprajna
Yaksha
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal @ganeshchetan What's Anti Muslim here? All we see is glorification with top actors playing characters like khilji and making them 'cool'.
0
0
0
@rajib2111
Raaz.rizz
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal 😂😂😂 haha ...
0
0
0
@toutsav
utsav pandey
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal Why do Muslim need to get touchy what been shown for invaders Muslim has nothing to do with Invaders, niether they are responsible what happend in those era but they have to realise they can't relate with those also by keep egulozing & feel touchy when shown in bad light
2
0
3
@Nacim88977477
Nacim
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal Sir ji better ignore such foolish activities done by hypernationalists. Only emotional fools side with historical charectors based on religious or regional identities. They were all Kings fighting to save their thrones. None of them had anything to do with nation or common man
0
0
1
@oraclenaveen
naveen
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal what is wrong with you think Jews should glorify Nazi Genocide of jews? Or Afghanistan Should glorify US/RUSSIAN invasion.Invader are enemy.any one in name of religion sided with enemy is also it Mir zafar or Iskandar Mirza.
0
0
0
@ManishP79938348
Manish Prasad,मनीष प्रसाद
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal Kuchh bhii.
0
0
0
@arunprabhakar81
Arun Prabhakar
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal Is it historically incorrect?
0
0
0
@Panrav1
Panrav
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal Are you saying Muslims were glorified in past by making "Jodha Akbar" & "Mulk" was made to shown Hindus in bad light. Pls allow cinema to flourish as liberal art form without any label.Disappointed professor.
0
0
0
@RustyRambler_
𝑾𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒕
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal In such times of Islmophobia, making a film which shows Muslims in bad light is a sure shot success formula. Filmmakers are ready to distort history to set the anti Muslim narrative. They will show it as Hindu Muslim fight instead of a struggle between 2 kings for power.
0
0
0
@Bees_Kut
InGenious
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal @BucketheadCase Exactly! Agli picture me Prithvi Raj Chauhan se Afghanistan pe attack Karwanayenge.
1
2
27
@nayeembiz
Nayeembiz
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal sir kyun TRP de rahe ho movie ko. Let them make, fictitious movies.
0
0
0
@rakeshnandnkt
Rakesh sharma
5 years
@Ahmed1Hilal यह कुछ वैसे ही जैसे हिन्दू विरोधी नैरेटिव बॉलीवुड में, इतिहास भी व्याख्या पर ही आधारित होता है। जरूरी है विद्वान लोग इन फिल्मों का समाज पर पड़ने वाले असर की बात करे और जंहा असर नकारात्मक पड़ने की संभावना हो वहाँ लोगो को शिक्षित किया जाए।
0
0
0