@YeezyIsBack
As curators it is our responsibility to conduct due diligence on projects.
As every seasoned investor in the space knows, the earlier in the lifecycle of a project the harder it is to assess its legitimacy.
With the limited information we have at the pre launch stage, we want…
Explicit Shoutout to the following SCAMS: ⚠️
$INS, $ARCX, $KAI &
@FjordFoundry
for partnering with these scams.
Inscribe launched in early 2024 during the BRC-narrative with promises of delivering a BRC20 marketplace. This promise hasn't been fulfilled yet, even after > 3…
Addition to this thread:
All of these 3 projects where curated by
@0xSherv
.
A curator should be partially responsible for where the cash flow goes that got raised during the LBP and to have the relevant KYC. Else these projects raised $20M+ based on nothing but promises.
@0xSherv
@YeezyIsBack
Man, What a careless attitude, you got your 2% fee that’s your incentive. If you can’t do proper due diligence then you have no role playing as a curator. There is no 2 ways about it.
If it’s too early project and you believe founders promise, then what value do you bring?